Menu
HomeAbout Dr. DivyaAesthetic TreatmentsClinical DermatologyBlogContact Us

Hyderabad

+91 8790983414

PRP vs GFC for Hair Loss: Which Treatment Is Right for You?

Both PRP and GFC use your own blood to stimulate hair growth, but they differ in processing, purity, and results. Here is a clinical comparison to help you make an informed decision.

PRP (Platelet-Rich Plasma)

PRP involves drawing blood, spinning it in a centrifuge, and injecting the platelet-rich layer into the scalp. It contains growth factors along with white blood cells and other plasma components.

Advantages

  • Established track record with years of clinical data
  • Widely available at most dermatology clinics
  • Effective for mild to moderate hair thinning
  • Lower cost per session compared to GFC

Limitations

  • - Contains white blood cells that can cause inflammation
  • - Results may take longer to appear
  • - Some patients experience post-procedure swelling

GFC (Growth Factor Concentrate)

GFC is the newer advancement. It uses a specialised kit to extract a purer concentration of growth factors without white blood cells, resulting in less inflammation and potentially faster results.

Advantages

  • Purer growth factor concentration
  • Less inflammation and post-procedure discomfort
  • Potentially faster visible results
  • Better tolerated by sensitive scalps

Limitations

  • - Higher cost per session than standard PRP
  • - Less long-term clinical data compared to PRP
  • - Not available at all clinics

Dr. Divya's Recommendation

Dr. Divya recommends GFC for most hair loss patients at Tatva Skin Clinic because of its purer formulation and better tolerability. However, standard PRP remains an effective and more affordable option. The best choice depends on your budget, scalp sensitivity, and how quickly you want to see results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Not Sure Which Treatment Is Right for You?

Dr. Divya will assess your specific concern and recommend the best approach during a consultation.

Book Consultation